What a shame, it really is.
As you probably know I always check my fellow sellers blogs, Jess’, Cindy’s, Rachy’s and Kez’s, and a couple of others. As well as their blogs I always follow the comments. You’ll notice that I comment too, in fact we comment on each other’s. We’re all friends, we support each other and we offer and receive advice when needed.
So I was very disappointed to see this comment on Rachy’s blog on the 21st Dec.
So not only is Michael slagging off other sellers but he is also slagging off Panty Hog. I can only think that Rachy hasn’t seen this comment since the 21st because Michael is not doing her any favours at all. I’d have deleted it!
He then had another pop at ‘other sellers’ this morning on Rachy’s blog.
- Michael Says:
December 26th, 2006 at 11:54 am I have carried on voting for you but I fear it is going to be of no use. I see a very popular panty site has told it’s visitors to vote for a couple of sites who they are chummy with. Personally I do not think other sellers should be allowed to influence the voting like that, it is unfair.
This is completely ridiculous. He clearly hasn’t even read Rachy’s blog where she has asked her readers to vote for another lovely seller - Kez.
It’s left a very nasty taste in my mouth I can tell you. I just can’t understand why this Michael would slag off us other sellers, I for one have been very supportive towards Rachy as a new seller, as has Jess and Cindy. We’ve recommended Rachy as a genuine seller to buyers that we share, we’ve given advice, support, help, everything. Check Rachy’s blog, we’ve lent support to her blog even. Check my blog, I have direct links to her blog, I have links to Rachy’s site on my site.
Rachy has done extremely well since joining Panty Hog with her fresh approach to selling and her youthful exuberance, as her amazing 12 nominations have proved, comments like those left on her blog really aren’t doing her any favours at all.
What a complete shame.
Edited to make it absolutely clear that this blog was not having a pop at Rachy in any way at all. It was criticising ‘Michael’ who unfairly judged Panty Hog and other sellers and by ’supporting’ and ’sticking up’ for her actually made things look very bad for Rachy, on her blog. In other words don’t comment on something that you clearly know nothing about, it can actually cause trouble for your favourite seller.
Filed under: Golden Panty Awards
December 21st, 2006 at 5:55 pm I think you have a great ass and I will vote for you as long as you don’t need to register at the forum. Most of the big sellers are not participating apart from pantyparadise, I just see the whole thing as a bit of a circus to be honest with you. Surely awards are not needed to make sales, from reading other blogs and looking at ‘participating’ members of the forum it seems that the results have already been decided in advance. It is like UK auction category, just one nominee, it shows just how seriously or not as the case may be that it is being taken. If you ask me the ones who beg the most will win and what a good job elections are not based on the same basis… One vote per person, not some desperate forum trying to drum up visits… The winners will all have to post links to the panty forum, no wonder they want so many categories, talk about free advertising.